PearlAI: Hyperpersonalization and Hyperlocalization as New AI Affordances in Basic Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT25113574Keywords:
PearlAI, hyperpersonalization, hyperlocalization, artificial intelligence in education, cultural relevance, student agency, equity, adaptive learning, basic education, AfricaAbstract
Persistent challenges of engagement, equity, and learning outcomes continue to undermine basic education across Africa and other resource-constrained regions. Traditional curricula and teaching models are often generic, culturally distant, and unable to address the diverse learning needs of students in marginalized communities. This paper explores the transformative potential of hyperpersonalization and hyperlocalization, two emergent affordances enabled by artificial intelligence (AI), to reimagine education in these contexts. Hyperlocalization allows for curriculum and content to be rooted in community-specific languages, histories, and lived experiences, thereby overcoming cultural irrelevance and enhancing representation. Hyperpersonalization enables adaptive, student-centred learning pathways that respond to individual interests, paces, and strengths, reducing performance gaps and fostering deeper engagement. Together, these affordances extend beyond traditional differentiated instruction by embedding agency, belonging, and contextual relevance directly into the design of learning experiences. Drawing on global case studies, including personalized learning in India, national device rollouts in Uruguay and Kenya, and mobile literacy interventions in Africa, the paper situates PearlAI as a prototype framework capable of operationalizing these concepts. While not all educational challenges can be resolved through technology, evidence suggests that hyperpersonalization and hyperlocalization hold promise for addressing critical barriers such as cultural disengagement, inequity, and limited student agency. By integrating these affordances into the PearlAI ecosystem, this paper argues that AI can shift personalization and contextualization from a luxury into a basic educational utility—one that fosters equity, resilience, and relevance in the twenty-first-century classroom.
Downloads
References
Aker, J. C., Ksoll, C., & Lybbert, T. J. (2020). Can mobile phones improve learning? Evidence from a field experiment in Niger. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 12(1), 67–99. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20170363
Banerjee, A., Cole, S., Duflo, E., & Linden, L. (2007). Remedying education: Evidence from two randomized experiments in India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1235–1264. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.122.3.1235 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.122.3.1235
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Cilliers, J., Fleisch, B., Prinsloo, C., & Taylor, S. (2020). How to improve teaching practice? Experimental evidence from South Africa. Journal of Human Resources, 55(4), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.55.4.1117-9191R1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.55.3.0618-9538R1
Cristia, J., Czerwonko, A., & Garofalo, P. (2017). Does technology in schools affect learning? The long-term impacts of the One Laptop per Child program in Peru (IDB Working Paper No. IDB-WP-829). Inter-American Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.18235/0000716 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18235/0000716
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68
Domínguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., de-Marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., Pagés, C., & Martínez-Herráiz, J.-J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers & Education, 63, 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.020
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
Freedman, S. W., Weinstein, H. M., Murphy, K., & Longman, T. (2008). Teaching history after identity-based conflicts: The Rwanda experience. Comparative Education Review, 52(4), 663–690. https://doi.org/10.1086/591301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/591302
Hilton, J. (2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: A review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 573–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9434-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9434-9
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Holstein, K., McLaren, B. M., & Aleven, V. (2019). Co-designing a real-time classroom orchestration tool to support teacher-AI complementarity. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paper 226). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300456 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.62.3
Hu, B., Zheng, L., Zhu, J., Ding, L., & Liu, Y. (2024). Teaching plan generation and evaluation with GPT-4: Unleashing the potential of LLM in instructional design. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2024.3384765
Kioko, A., Ndung’u, R. W., Njoroge, M. C., & Mutiga, J. (2014). Language and education in Africa: Mother-tongue instruction and multilingualism. Multilingual Education, 4(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13616-014-0018-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13616-014-0018-x
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465
Madise, Ü., & Martens, T. (2006). E-voting in Estonia 2005. The first practice of country-wide binding Internet voting in the world. In R. Krimmer (Ed.), Electronic Voting 2006 (pp. 15–26). GI Lecture Notes in Informatics.
Manyozo, L. (2012). Media, communication and development: Three approaches. SAGE.
Meyer, J. (2024). Using LLMs to bring evidence-based feedback into the classroom. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 27(2), 123-135.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Mohohlwane, N., Taylor, S., & Cilliers, J. (2023). Language of learning and teaching and early grade reading outcomes: Evidence from South Africa’s EGRS. International Journal of Educational Development, 98, 102718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102718 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102718
Muralidharan, K., Singh, A., & Ganimian, A. J. (2019). Disrupting education? Experimental evidence on technology-aided personalized learning in India. American Economic Review, 109(4), 1426–1460. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20171112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20171112
Pastötter, B., & Bäuml, K.-H. (2014). Retrieval practice enhances new learning: The forward effect of testing. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 286. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00286 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00286
Rekha, K., Gopal, K., Satheeskumar, D., & Anitha, S. (2024). AI-powered personalized learning system design: Student engagement and performance tracking system. 2024 4th International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACITE60783.2024.10617155
Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2016). The power of interest for motivation and engagement. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771045
Roschelle, J., Feng, M., Murphy, R. F., & Mason, C. A. (2016). Online mathematics homework increases student achievement. AERA Open, 2(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416673968 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416673968
Severin, E., & Capota, C. (2011). One-to-one laptop programs in Latin America and the Caribbean: Panorama and policy recommendations. Inter-American Development Bank. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18235/0008835
Sheikh, F. (2024). AI-powered assessment and feedback: Enhancing student engagement and performance. AI EDIFY Journal, 1(1), 45-58.
Stevenson, D. L., & Baker, D. P. (1991). State control of the curriculum and classroom instruction. Sociology of Education, 64(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112783 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2112887
UNESCO. (2022). Global education monitoring report 2022: Technology in education – A tool on whose terms? UNESCO Publishing.
Unwin, T., Abrahams, L., Kleessen, B., & Weber, M. (2020). Education for All in Africa: Still aspirational in the digital age? UNESCO (Information for All Programme) / Commonwealth of Learning.
van Pinxteren, B. (2022). Language of instruction issues in African classrooms: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Development, 93, 102630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102630 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102630
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wasonga, T. A., Ndichu, M., & Mboroki, G. (2020). Kenya’s Digital Literacy Programme: Prospects and challenges for sustainability. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 16(2), 4–21.
Weiss, D. J. (1982). Improving measurement quality and efficiency with adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6(4), 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168200600408 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168200600408
World Bank. (2019). Ending learning poverty: What will it take? World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/32353
World Bank. (2022). The State of Global Learning Poverty: 2022 Update. World Bank Group.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
