Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Steel Plate Fault Prediction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT2511643Keywords:
Fault prediction, Machine Learning, Steel Plate, Artificial LearningAbstract
Steel plates are significant in many industries. Making steel plates requires careful quality checks and traditional ways to find faults. In the manufacturing sector, machine learning-based steel plate defect detection is important to guarantee excellent product quality and operational success. Faults like cracks, surface abnormalities, or inclusions can be found instantly using automatic detection, lowering the need for manual inspections and speeding up the production process. By analysing historical data from several sensors utilized during the production process, we can train machine-learning models to spot patterns. These models can predict the probability of defects before they appear. This new solution has the potential to change the steel industry by improving efficiency and reducing costs. The study highlights the growing role of machine learning (ML) in automating and enhancing the detection of defects on steel surfaces. Five common machine learning models were assessed in this study: Random Forest (RF), Extra Tree, Logistic Regression, and Light Gradient Boosting Machine Classifier (LGBM). We assessed their performance using metrics like Precision, Recall, and F1 score. The results reveal that the Light Gradient Boosting Machine Classifier (LGBM) is the most effective algorithm.
Downloads
References
Ceryan N., Ozkat E. C., Korkmaz Can N., Ceryan S., Machine learning models to estimate the elastic modulus of weathered magmatic rocks. Environmental Earth Sciences 80(12), 1-24, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09738-9
Alkan B., Bullock, S., Assessing operational complexity of manufacturing systems based on algorithmic complexity of key performance indicator time-series. Journal of the Operational Research Society 72(10), 2241-2255, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1779622
Gao Y., Gao L., Li X., Yan X., A semi-supervised convolutional neural network-based method for steel surface defect recognition. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 61, 101825, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101825
Xu L. D., Xu E. L., Li L. Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. International journal of production research 56(8), 2941-2962, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806
Zhang X., Kano M., Tani M., Mori J., Ise J., Harada K., Prediction and causal analysis of defects in steel products: Handling nonnegative and highly over-dispersed count data. Control Engineering Practice 95, 104258, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2019.104258
Xiong J., Pang Q., Cheng W., Wang N., Yong Z., Reservoir risk modeling using a hybrid approach based on the feature selection technique and ensemble methods. Geocarto International 37(11), 3312-3336, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2020.1852615
Markoulidakis I., Rallis I., Georgoulas I., Kopsiaftis G., Doulamis A., Doulamis N., Multiclass Confusion Matrix Reduction Method and Its Application on Net Promoter Score Classification Problem. Technologies 9(4), 81, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies9040081
J. Sun, C. Yan, and J. Wen, ‘‘Intelligent bearing fault diagnosis method combining compressed data acquisition and deep learning,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 185–195, Jan. 2018.
J. Sun, C. Yan, and J. Wen, ‘‘Intelligent bearing fault diagnosis method combining compressed data acquisition and deep learning,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 185–195, Jan. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2017.2759418
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
