A Review of Machine Learning Approaches for User Engagement Profiling in Online Retail: Integrating Google Analytics for Predictive Insights

Authors

  • Rohini Sharma Research Scholar, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Indo Global Group of Colleges, Abhipur, New Chandigarh, Punjab, India Author
  • ER. Vanita Rani Assistant Professor and Head, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Indo Global Group of Colleges, Abhipur, New Chandigarh, Punjab, India Author

Keywords:

User Engagement, Machine Learning, Google Analytics, Predictive Analytics, E-commerce, Decision Trees, Digital Marketing, Review

Abstract

The digital marketplace has evolved from a transactional platform to an experiential ecosystem, making user engagement a paramount metric for success. This review paper synthesizes current knowledge and presents a novel framework for integrating Machine Learning (ML) with Google Analytics (GA) data to transition from descriptive analytics to predictive user engagement profiling in online retail. We begin by delineating the critical imperative of understanding user engagement in the modern e-commerce landscape, highlighting the limitations of traditional, descriptive analytics platforms like GA, which, despite providing rich behavioral data, lack inherent predictive capabilities. The paper then systematically reviews and compares prominent machine learning classification algorithms—specifically Decision Trees (DTs), Naïve Bayes (NB), and k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN)—for their applicability in modeling and predicting user behavior. Drawing on a synthesized empirical study, we demonstrate that Decision Trees can achieve superior accuracy (97.98%) and, more importantly, offer high interpretability through actionable decision rules derived from features like event count and bounce rate. Furthermore, this review elaborates on the architectural considerations for building a robust ML-GA integration pipeline, encompassing data ingestion, feature engineering, model deployment, and continuous monitoring. Finally, we discuss practical applications, identify prevailing research gaps—such as handling class imbalance and the need for real-time, cross-platform profiling—and outline future research directions, including the incorporation of Explainable AI (XAI) and Generative AI. This paper concludes that the synergistic integration of ML and GA data represents the next frontier for enabling proactive, personalized, and data-driven digital marketing strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Gartner, Inc. "Market Guide for Web, Product, and Digital Experience Analytics"; Gartner, Inc.: Stamford, CT, USA, 2024.

Lalmas, M.; O’Brien, H.; Yom-Tov, E. "Measuring User Engagement," Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015.

Vakulski Group. "Complete Guide to User Engagement in Google Analytics 4." Vakulski Group Blog, 2024.

Inge, C.J. "Measuring the Web’s Data, Marketing Analytics: A Comprehensive Guide," Version 1.0; Boston Academic Publishing, Inc.: Boston, MA, USA, 2022.

Mitchell, T.M. Machine Learning; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1997.

Incendium. "Why Google Analytics Doesn’t Give You the Full Story on Engagement." 2024.

InfoTrust. "Predictive Analytics in Google Analytics 4: Machine Learning." 2024.

Coleman, B. "The Ultimate Guide to Customer Engagement in 2024." HubSpot Blog, 2021.

Aluri, A.; Price, B.S.; McIntyre, N.H. "Using Machine Learning to Cocreate Value Through Dynamic Customer Engagement in a Brand Loyalty Program." J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2019, 43, 78–100.

Naprawski, T. "The Impact of Web Analytics Tools on Knowledge Management." Procedia Comput. Sci. 2023, 225, 3404–3414.

Chokrasamesiri, P.; Senivongse, T. "User Engagement Analytics Based on Web Contents." Comput. Inf. Sci. 2016, 656, 73–87.

Muhamedyev, R.; Yakunin, K.; Iskakov, S.; Sainova, S.; Abdilmanova, A.; Kuchin, Y. "Comparative analysis of classification algorithms." In Proceedings of the 2015 9th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT), Rostov on Don, Russia, 14–16 October 2015.

Barbaro, E.; Grua, E.M.; Malavolta, I.; Stercevic, M.; Weusthof, E.; van den Hoven, J. "Modelling and Predicting User Engagement in Mobile Applications." Data Sci. 2020, 3, 61–77.

ExactMetrics. "Guide to User Engagement Metrics in Google Analytics." 2024.

Wu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Hu, S. "Review on Classification Algorithm and Evaluation System of Machine Learning." In Proceedings of the 2020 13th International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation (ICICTA), Xi’an, China, 24–25 October 2020.

Google Developers. "Google Analytics Data API v1." https://developers.google.com/analytics/devguides/reporting/data/v1

Google Cloud. "Export events from Google Analytics 4 to BigQuery." https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/docs/ga4-export

Guyon, I.; Elisseeff, A. "An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection." J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2003, 3, 1157–1182.

Hastie, T.; Tibshirani, R.; Friedman, J. The Elements of Statistical Learning; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009.

Witten, I.H.; Frank, E.; Hall, M.A. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 3rd ed.; Morgan Kaufmann Publishers: Burlington, MA, USA, 2011.

Sculley, D., et al. "Hidden Technical Debt in Machine Learning Systems." In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28 (NIPS 2015).

Quinlan, J.R. "Induction of Decision Trees." Mach. Learn. 1986, 1, 81-106.

DataCamp. "Naive Bayes Classifier in Python with Scikit-Learn." DataCamp Tutorials.

Javatpoint. "K-Nearest Neighbour Algorithm for Machine Learning."

Karim, M.; Rahman, R.M. "Decision Tree and Naïve Bayes Algorithm for Classification and Generation of Actionable Knowledge for Direct Marketing." J. Softw. Eng. Appl. 2013, 6, 196–206.

Chibudike, C.E.; Abdu, H.; Ngige, O.C.; Adeyoju, O.A.; Chibudike, H.O.; Obi, N.I. "Machine Learning—A New Trend in Web User Behaviour Analysis." Int. J. Comput. Appl. 2021, 183, 5.

Yadav, K.; Thareja, R. "Comparing the Performance of Naive Bayes and Decision Tree Classification Using R." Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl. 2019, 11, 11–19.

Rahmadani, S.; Dongoran, A.; Zarlis, M.; Zakarias. "Comparison of Naive Bayes and Decision Tree on Feature Selection Using Genetic Algorithm for Classification Problem." J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018, 978, 012087.

Powers, D.M.W. "Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness and Correlation." J. Mach. Learn. Technol. 2011, 2, 37–63.

Chawla, N.V., et al. "SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique." Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2002, 16, 321-357.

Molnar, C. "Interpretable Machine Learning: A Guide for Making Black Box Models Explainable." 2022.

Pes, B. "Learning from High-Dimensional and Class-Imbalanced Datasets Using Random Forests." Information 2021, 12, 286.

Dong, J.; Qian, Q. "A Density-Based Random Forest for Imbalanced Data Classification." Future Internet 2022, 14, 90.

Breiman, L.; Friedman, J.H.; Olshen, R.A.; Stone, C.J. Classification and Regression Trees; Wadsworth International Group: Belmont, CA, USA, 1984.

Russel, S.; Norvig, P. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 3rd ed.; Prentice Hall: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2003.

Downloads

Published

05-11-2025

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Rohini Sharma and ER. Vanita Rani, “A Review of Machine Learning Approaches for User Engagement Profiling in Online Retail: Integrating Google Analytics for Predictive Insights”, Int. J. Sci. Res. Comput. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 23–31, Nov. 2025, Accessed: Dec. 06, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://mail.ijsrcseit.com/index.php/home/article/view/CSEIT251117147